Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Reporting'.
Found 297 results
-
Content ArticleThe Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) is an important part of the continuing effort by the US government, industry and individuals to maintain and improve aviation safety. The ASRS collects voluntarily submitted aviation safety incident/situation reports from pilots, controllers and others. it analyses and responds to these incident reports to reduce the likelihood of aviation accidents. ASRS data are used to: identify deficiencies and discrepancies in the National Aviation System (NAS) so that these can be remedied by appropriate authorities. support policy formulation, planning for and improvements to the NAS. strengthen the foundation of aviation human factors safety research. This is particularly important since it is generally recognised that over two-thirds of all aviation accidents and incidents have their roots in human performance errors. The ASRS website outlines the purpose and aims of the system, provides details on how to submit reports and lists related research studies and resources.
-
Content ArticleIn rare cases, healthcare providers who have contributed to accidental patient harm may be criminally prosecuted to obtain justice for the patient and family or to set an example, which theoretically prevents other providers from making similar mistakes due to fear of punishment. This strategy was chosen in the recent case of RaDonda Vaught, who was convicted of criminally negligent homicide and impaired adult abuse after a medication error killed a patient in 2017. This article in the journal Human Factors in Healthcare discusses the case and its ramifications for healthcare staff and systems. The authors provide recommendations for actions that healthcare organisations should take to foster a safer and more resilient healthcare system, including: placing an emphasis on just culture. ensuring timely, systems-level investigations of all incidents. refining and bolstering participation in national reporting systems. incorporating Human Factors professionals at multiple levels of organisations. establishing a national safety board for medicine in the US.
-
Content ArticleOn 7 March 2023 the coroner commenced an investigation into the death of Ian Darwin, aged 42. The investigation has not yet concluded and the inquest has not yet been heard. However, during the course of the investigation the inquiries revealed matters giving rise to concern. The coroner concluded that in his opinion there is a risk that future deaths could occur unless action is taken.
-
Content Article
Near misses or great catches? A blog by Emma Walker
Patient Safety Learning posted an article in In health care
After attending a recent Patient Safety Management Network session, Emma Walker reflects on reporting on near misses. -
Content Article
.jpg.03433cb362dbc7cb5fb2fb28dd20b1e3.jpg)
Have you ever stopped and considered what the link is between the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) and Hollywood? Probably not. Most likely, you have spent the summer of 2023 immersed in your organisation’s transition from the Serious Incident Framework (SIF) to PSIRF. Outside work, for those of us who are cinema-goers, our main Hollywood-related dilemma has revolved around which to watch first, Barbie or Oppenheimer? At the end of April 2023, we were offered the opportunity to present at the Health Care Plus conference, held at the EXCEL centre in London. Ours was the graveyard slot: Day 2 of the conference; 3.15 pm. The time when, quite understandably, the conference participants attentional capacity is usually waning. How could we encourage participants to stay the distance? How do you make a graveyard slot at the end of a two-day conference engaging? More importantly, how do you rise to that challenge when the topic is implementing PSIRF? Our solution? Bring in Hollywood. Make PSIRF glamorous. Our blog shares what we presented: ‘PSIRF: The Hollywood Edit'. Unifying key messages from NHS England’s PSIRF guidance (NHS England, August 2022) with Hollywood movie titles and a bit of what we have learnt and reflected on along the way.- Posted
- 4 comments
-
8
-
- (and 6 more)
-
Content ArticleThe horrifying case of neonatal nurse Lucy Letby, convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder six others at the Countess of Chester Hospital, has raised hard questions for NHS leaders about how organisations respond to concerns about staff, but could digital systems help detect NHS staff who harm patients at an earlier point? If the pattern connecting Letby to the babies’ deaths had been detected by a digital system, would the response from the trust have been different? Would a machine have been believed? Alison Leary, chair of healthcare and workforce modelling at London South Bank University and a leading expert on nursing and data, suggests there is potentially a much bigger role for digital in patient safety.
-
Content Article
On 18 August 2023, Lucy Letby was found guilty of murdering seven babies and convicted of trying to kill six other infants at the Countess of Chester Hospital. Looking ahead to the forthcoming independent inquiry into this case, Patient Safety Learning, reflecting on the inquiries of the past, sets out some key patient safety themes and issues that should be considered as part of this.- Posted
- 3 comments
-
3
-
- (and 9 more)
-
Content ArticleThis guide published by NHS England & Improvement describes the validation rules relating to the LFPSE project, specifically around submitting an Adverse Event via the Adverse Event Application Programming Interface (API). It covers several types of validation rules, which have been split into three sections. Bespoke business validation rules which have been implemented based on the dependencies between responses and extensions that cannot be captured by the FHIR resource validation. FHIR validation responses which may be returned from the API when native FHIR validation checks the submission body against the LFPSE FHIR profiles defined for an adverse event. Invalid operations and similar responses which are external to validation of the submission, including responses pertaining to permissions, personal information and any other responses that do not fit into the two categories above.
-
Content Article
This is part of our series of Patient Safety Spotlight interviews, where we talk to people working for patient safety about their role and what motivates them. Kath talks to us about why she set up Sling the Mesh and the significant impact that campaigning has on her life. She also highlights the need to establish systems that will identify and prevent avoidable harm, including long term tracking to investigate trends of harm, reporting of industry payments to clinicians and making logging side effects mandatory for healthcare professionals. -
Content ArticleThis NHS dentistry and oral health update has a special focus on patient safety. It includes an introduction by newly appointed Interim Chief Dental Officer (CDO) for England, Jason Wong and covers the following topics: Quality and safety in dental care Contributing to patient safety learning Using the Learning from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service Patient safety incidents and harm Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) Spotlight on Project Sphere Regulatory support Clinical leadership in patient safety
-
Content ArticleThis guidance for users of the new Learn from Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service provides context and guidance on selection of appropriate categories when recording incidents. It focuses on which Event Type is appropriate for different circumstances, and how to select the most appropriate options for the Levels of Harm categorisation required within Patient Safety Incidents. It covers the following topics: Definitions – event types Definitions – harm grading When are harm grading fields mandatory? Recording guidance questions and answers
-
Content ArticleJust like near-miss reporting, a formal good catch program promotes reporting and learning while providing important metrics that can be tracked and trended over time. It turns a company’s safety philosophy into a clear reality. This article, published by Safety Management Group (SMG), looks at the importance of reporting 'good catches' and the positive impact this can have on safety culture and behaviour.
-
Content ArticleA good catch in healthcare is recognised as an employee interception of a potential safety event before a patient is harmed. Both near misses and good catches present healthcare organisations with opportunities for learning to reduce harmful events, which is why reporting near misses in healthcare should be a priority for all organisations, regardless of type or size. It is important that all employees can recognise common examples of good catches in healthcare that prevent patient harm before it reaches the patient. This article, published by Performance Health Partners, includes five situations in which harm can likely occur when no action is taken. It also looks at how to establish a good catch program and how to recognise staff for reporting.
-
Content Article
Near-miss and good-catch reporting
Patient_Safety_Learning posted an article in Quality and safety reports
In this article, published by Incident Prevention, authors define what a 'near miss' or 'good catch' is and look at why it is so important to report them. -
Content ArticleWales' national policy on patient safety incident reporting and management.
- Posted
- 1 comment
-
1
-
- (and 14 more)
-
Content Article
This policy paper from the Department of Health and Social Care sets out the Government’s response to the recommendations of the Independent Investigation into East Kent Maternity services. -
Community Post
Near misses
Claire Cox posted a topic in Investigations, risk management and legal issues
- (and 1 more)
Do any areas of healthcare capture ALL near misses and act on them? What systems do you use? -
Community Post
How nurses can spot and report error traps and near misses
HelenH posted a topic in Stories from the front line
- (and 4 more)
How can nurses spot error traps and near misses so that Trusts can learn, respond and take action to prevent unsafe care? What are the barriers to nurses using their insight and where is the good practice that we can share? Any ideas, anyone?- Posted
- 5 replies
-
- (and 4 more)
-
Content ArticleThe Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) is the largest database of patient safety event reports in the US. In addition to over 4.5 million acute care reports, the PA-PSRS database contains more than 396,000 long-term care healthcare-associated infection (HAI) reports. This study in Patient Safety aimed to look at trends in HAIs in long term care using data from the PA-PSRS database. The study found that there was an increase in the total number and rate of infections reported to PA-PSRS in 2022.
-
Content ArticlePennsylvania is the only state that requires acute care facilities to report all events of harm or potential for harm. The Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) is the largest repository of patient safety data in the United States and one of the largest in the world, with over 4.5 million acute care event reports dating back to 2004. Herein, we examine patient safety event reports submitted to the PA-PSRS acute care database in 2022 and compare them to prior years. The authors extracted data from PA-PSRS and obtained data from the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4). Counts of reports were calculated based on report submission date, and rates were calculated based on event occurrence date and calculated per 1,000 patient days for hospitals or 1,000 surgical encounters for ambulatory surgical facilities (ASFs). The study found there was a decrease in the number of incident reports submitted to PA-PSRS in 2022 and an increase in serious and high harm event reports.
-
Content ArticleThis study in the Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management aimed to assess the patient safety situation in Ghana across the World Health Organization's (WHO’s) 12 action areas of patient safety. The authors used interviews and observation including a WHO adapted questionnaire across 16 selected hospitals, including two teaching hospitals selected from the northern and southern parts of the Ghana. The key strength identified in the patient safety situational analysis was knowledge and learning in patient safety, while patient safety surveillance was the weakest action area identified. There were also weaknesses in areas such as national patient policy, healthcare associated infections, surgical safety, patient safety partnerships and patient safety funding.
-
Content ArticleThis study in PLOS ONE assessed the frequency of adverse event reporting in Ghanaian hospitals, the patient safety culture determinants of the adverse event reporting and the implications for Ghanaian healthcare facilities. The authors found that the majority of health professionals had at least reported adverse events in the past 12 months across all 13 healthcare facilities studied. The patient safety culture dimensions were statistically significant in distinguishing between participants who frequently reported adverse events and otherwise.
-
Content ArticleOver time and across the world, the need to be transparent with patients and families when care has not gone well is now recognised as a key element of high-quality, safe and patient-centred healthcare. However, a significant gap still persists and some organisations have yet to welcome a transparent and accountable approach, while others fail to turn these principles into reliable actions. This editorial in BMJ Quality & Safety highlights the vulnerable position patient and families are in after error disclosure and looks at how data on processes around error disclosure are key to improvement. The authors call for healthcare organisations to redouble their engagement with patients and families who have been harmed by their healthcare and use the principles of accountability, compassion and transparency to drive their response.
-
Content Article
Adverse incidents arising from suboptimal healthcare are a major cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. Arriving at an understanding of the conditions under which adverse incidents occur has the potential to improve the safety of healthcare provision. Staff working in the NHS have been contributing their experiences via a narrative data capture platform – SenseMaker – to help gain contextual insights on a wide range of topics under exploration by the NHS Horizons team. This blog by Rosanna Hunt (Senior Associate, NHS Horizons) in collaboration with Lizzy MacNamara (Junior Research Consultant, The Cynefin Co.) and Taj Nathan (Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist, Cheshire & the Wirral Partnership Foundation Trust) describes how the SenseMaker® platform could be used to extract staff experiences on the topic of patient safety incidents both reported and unreported by staff, and the facilitated conversations that would be needed to transform the data into actionable insights and commitment to change. -
Content ArticleThis report examines the reporting of patient deaths at the Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation NHS Trust (NSFT) between April 2019 and October 2022. It was undertaken by Grant Thornton on behalf of the NHS Suffolk and North East Essex and NHS Norfolk and Waveney integrated care boards at NSFT’s request.
.jpg.03433cb362dbc7cb5fb2fb28dd20b1e3.jpg)
