Search the hub
Showing results for tags 'Reporting'.
Found 296 results
-
Content ArticleOnline reporting tools are a key component of professional accountability programmes as they allow hospital staff to report co-worker unprofessional behaviour. Ethos is a whole-of-hospital professional accountability programme that includes an online messaging system, which has now been implemented across multiple Australian hospitals. This study examined reported unprofessional behaviour that staff indicated created a risk to patient safety. It included 1310 Ethos submissions reporting co-worker unprofessional behaviour between 2017 and 2020 across eight Australian hospitals. The findings indicate that unprofessional behaviour was associated with risks to patient safety. Co-worker reports about unprofessional behaviour have significant value as they can be used by organisations to better understand how unprofessional behaviour can disrupt work practices and lead to risks to patient safety.
-
Content ArticleThe Canadian Medication Incident Reporting and Prevention System (CMIRPS) is a national voluntary medication incident and ‘near miss’ reporting programme founded for the purpose of sharing the learning experiences from medication errors. Implementation of preventative strategies and system safeguards to decrease the risk for error-induced injury and thereby promote medication safety in healthcare is our collaborative goal. Medication incidents (including near misses) can be reported to ISMP Canada (i) through the website: www.ismpcanada.ca/report/ (ii) by telephone: 416-733-3131 or toll free: 1-866-544-7672.
-
News Article
Maternity services ‘overwhelmed with reporting requirements’, warns DHSC group
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Government has been warned by its own advisory group that maternity services are being “overwhelmed with reporting requirements” which are hindering safety improvement work, according to documents seen by HSJ. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) set up the “independent working group” on neonatal and maternal care to oversee its response to Donna Ockenden’s spring 2022 inquiry report into Shropshire maternity services; and was then asked to do the same for key recommendations from Bill Kirkup’s report later that year on failings in East Kent. The group is led by the Royal College of Midwives and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and made up of representatives of maternity staff. It was asked particularly to look into advising on two Kirkup recommendations: first, on improving standards of professional behaviour and “embedding compassionate care”, including asking royal colleges and others how this can be done. Second, charging the royal colleges and others “with reporting on how teamworking in maternity and neonatal care can be improved, with particular reference to establishing common purpose, objectives, and training from the outset”. However, a recent report from the working group, to the DHSC, released under the Freedom of Information Act, suggests the staff groups are arguing there is little scope to introduce more change. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 18 June 2024 -
News Article
C2-Ai launches Maternal and Neonatal Observatory
Clive Flashman posted a news article in News
C2.AI has formally launched its Maternity and Neonatal Observatory at the NHS ConfedExpo in Manchester (Government and Public Sector Journal). The observatory is intended to give hospitals and clinicians a detailed picture of the performance of maternity units and the health trajectories of individual women, so areas of concern can be identified and acted on. The system works by calculating and comparing observed outcomes for women and babies with expected outcomes for these individuals. To do this, it uses AI and machine learning to assess clinical factors, case-mix, and the social determinants of health. Early adopters within the NHS, where maternity services are under intense scrutiny, are expected soon. -
Content ArticleThis poster from presents preliminary data from a proof-of-concept examining the use of artificial intelligence technology, which can aid medical staff in locating, automatically reporting and effectively classifying safety incidents
-
Content ArticleThe Thirlwall Inquiry is examining events at the Countess of Chester Hospital and their implications following the trial, and subsequent convictions, of former neonatal nurse Lucy Letby of murder and attempted murder of babies at the hospital. As part of this Inquiry, its Terms of Reference asks: “Whether recommendations to address culture and governance issues made by previous inquiries into the NHS have been implemented into wider NHS practice? To what effect?”. To help inform its work in this area, the Inquiry Legal Team has produced this Table of Inquiries and reviews which have been conducted in England and Wales over the last thirty years. Recommendations from each Inquiry have been set out in a comprehensive table, alongside details of whether or not those recommendations have been implemented.
-
Content ArticleThe Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) is the largest repository of patient safety data in the United States and one of the largest in the world, with over 4.7 million acute care event reports dating back to 2004. This article in the journal Patient Safety analyses the patient safety event reports submitted to PA-PSRS in 2023.
-
Content ArticleMeasures exist to improve early recognition of and response to deteriorating patients in hospital. However, management of critical illness remains a problem globally; in the United Kingdom, 7% of the deaths reported to National Reporting and Learning System from acute hospitals in 2015 related to failure to recognize or respond to deterioration. The current study explored whether routinely recording patient-reported wellness is associated with objective measures of physiology to support early recognition of hospitalised deteriorating patients.
-
Content ArticleThis report contains the findings and recommendations of the Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) Expert Review Panel formed under Section 103 of the 2020 Aircraft Certification, Safety, and Accountability Act (ACSAA). Reporting to the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Congressional committees of jurisdiction, the Expert Panel reviewed the safety management processes and their effectiveness for each holder of an ODA for the design and production of transport aeroplanes.
-
Content ArticleFear of retaliation by leaders or colleagues can prevent staff from reporting adverse events, unsafe conditions, or near misses. This article presents strategies to improve just culture in the perioperative environment, which is prone to hierarchical structure. Strategies include creating an accessible reporting system, implementation of a "good catch" programme, and leadership support for staff who submit reports.
-
Event
Integrated Governance - CQG Series
Sam posted an event in Community Calendar
The overall objective of this masterclass is to build good governance commitment, capacity, and resilience in the face of severe resource constraints and complex staff, patient, political and regulatory expectations. The programme is interactive, developmental, based on best practice and focused on achievable improvement of practice, behaviours and outcomes. The course includes online access to the relevant CQG e-learning module for 12 months and a discount code to purchase additional modules. This masterclass is one of a series that will help enhance your understanding and application of governance in healthcare, this module is designed to help boards avoid silo thinking, over-complex agendas or multiple reports by exploring the three elements of Integrated Governance which are: Integrated thinking, systems, and reporting. At the completion of this module, the participant will be able to: Appreciate the value of integrated thinking Recognise the importance of building integrated systems Understand the importance of integrated reporting to inform management, the board, and stakeholders Apply the learning to the participant’s own organisation using the CQG Maturity Matrix. Register -
Content ArticleThis report examined whether the NHS has been successful in improving the patient safety culture, encouraging reporting and learning from patient safety incidents.
-
Content ArticleCentral venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used in US critical care settings for medication administration, monitoring and reliable venous access. Despite the benefits of CVCs, complications, particularly infections, have become a major focus of US hospital quality improvement efforts due to federal and state initiatives that emphasise patient safety, transparency and accountability. In this commentary in JAMA Network, the authors look at recent research surrounding CVC complications and highlight approaches to help tackle these issues.
-
Content ArticleIn this article, investigative journalist Scilla Alecci reports on a court case brought against medical tech company Medtronic by a US whistleblower. Former Medtronic sales representative Leanne Houston alleges that between 2016 and 2018 she witnessed the company engaging in “unlawful conduct” by offering several US hospitals free equipment in exchange for the exclusive use of Medtronic products. She also claims that the company failed to acknowledge and deal with reports from surgeons that one of its surgical staple devices was causing harm to patients.
-
Content ArticleOver the past decade, the implementation of simulation education in health care has increased exponentially. Simulation-based education allows learners to practice patient care in a controlled, psychologically safe environment without the risk of harming a patient. Facilitators may identify medical errors during instruction, aiding in developing targeted education programs leading to improved patient safety. However, medical errors that occur during simulated health care may not be reported broadly in the simulation literature. This study in the Journal of Patient Safety aimed to identify and categorise the type and frequency of reported medical errors in healthcare simulation.
-
Content ArticleA growing awareness of sex and gender bias in evidence has resulted in the development of new tools to address this concern. The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines and the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER) are two initiatives designed to foster more transparent research and reporting practices that bridge the gender evidence gap. These tools enable researchers to unravel the complexities that underpin health risks and outcomes and generate more accurate and relevant findings that can inform effective and equitable policies for better health outcomes. This Lancet article looks at the World Health Organization's (WHO's) adoption of GATHER and the SAGER guidelines to tackle sporadic and suboptimal reporting of sex and gender data. The authors argue that this move is pivotal within WHO's broader strategic agenda, which it outlined in the Roadmap to Advance Gender Equality, Human Rights and Health Equity 2023–2030, launched in December 2023.
-
Content ArticleIn this letter to Health Secretary Steve Brine MP, members of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Pandemic Response and Recovery raise serious concerns about the approach of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) to patient safety. They outline problems within the MHRA that continue to put patients at serious risk of harm. The letter also highlights the role of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review (IMMDS), in its thorough investigation of Primodos, sodium valproate and pelvic mesh in bringing some of these concerns to the fore. It points to recent evidence presented to the APPG that indicates that the MHRA is at the heart of wider endemic failings, with issues uncovered so far being "the tip of a sizeable iceberg of failure." The letter outlines concerns about the following areas: The Yellow Card Scheme Conflicts of interest and transparency History of regulatory failures in the MHRA It calls on the Health and Social Care Select Committee to investigate these issues and make recommendations to the government on: legislative changes as to who is obligated to report adverse drug reactions. funding changes to the MHRA. separation of regulatory approval duties from post marketing pharmacovigilance. more inclusion of patients. greater transparency across the board. proper enforcement of Part 14 of the Human Medicines Regulations 2012.
-
Content Article
This is part of our series of Patient Safety Spotlight interviews, where we talk to people working for patient safety about their role and what motivates them. Kevin talks to us about the role research plays in improving staff and patient safety. He explains how his own research has uncovered the extent of violence experienced by student nurses and the underreporting of sharps injuries among healthcare students. He also highlights how research can help universities improve awareness of issues facing students across all healthcare courses and provide more effective support. -
Content ArticleStudies have reported evidence on sharps injuries among nursing, medical and dental students but little is known about the amount, type and causes of sharps injuries affecting other healthcare students. This narrative review aimed to identify the extent, type and causes of sharps injuries sustained by healthcare students, especially those not in nursing, medicine or dentistry. The review highlights that some groups of healthcare students, including those studying pharmacy, physiotherapy and radiography, sustain sharps injuries from similar devices as reported in research on such injuries in nursing, medical and nursing students. Sharps injuries happen in a range of healthcare environments, and many were not reported by students. The main cause of a sharps injury identified was a lack of knowledge.
-
Content ArticleSHOT is the UK’s independent, professionally-led haemovigilance scheme. It collects and analyses anonymised information on adverse events and reactions in blood transfusion from all healthcare organisations that are involved in the transfusion of blood and blood components in the United Kingdom. This document contains updated information on reporting categories and what to report to the scheme.
-
Content ArticleThe aim of this study was to investigate the incident reporting process (IR1s), to calculate the costs of reporting incidents in this context and to gain an indication of how economic the process was and whether it could be improved to yield better outcomes.
-
News Article
Maternity delays spark thousands of safety alerts each year
Patient Safety Learning posted a news article in News
Maternity departments are raising thousands of safety reports every year about delayed inductions of labour, HSJ can reveal. Induction of labour may be used when women are overdue, because their waters have broken, or for other medical reasons to speed up the birth, such as poor growth of the baby. Delaying induction therefore may increase risks for both mothers and babies and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence says trusts should raise a “red flag event” if it is delayed for more than two hours after admission. Information collected by HSJ from 50 trusts show 4,945 red flags related to delays in induction of labour in 2022-23. HSJ also found 3,109 reports in 2021-22 and 1,807 in 2020-21 across 47 trusts. Meanwhile, there were 1,997 Datix reports mentioning induction of labour in 2022-23 across 59 trusts able to give HSJ figures, in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, compared with 1,690 in 2021-22 and 1,368 in 2020-21. The Care Quality Commission has also raised concerns in inspections that incidents which should have been treated as “red flags” have not always been reported as such. The watchdog has also raised concerns about a lack of board-level oversight of maternity safety incidents and a need for clearer guidance for staff on reporting processes. Read full story (paywalled) Source: HSJ, 2 April 2024 -
Content Article'Failure to rescue' is the rate of death amongst patients with postoperative complications and has been proposed as a perioperative quality indicator. However, there may be significant variation in its definition between research studies. This study in the journal Surgery systematically reviewed all surgical literature reporting failure to rescue rates and examined variations in the definition of the ‘numerator,’ ‘denominator’ and timing of failure to rescue measurement. The authors found that failure to rescue is an important concept in the study of postoperative outcomes, but its definition is highly variable and poorly reported. They highlight that researchers should be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches to defining failure to rescue.
-
Content ArticleThomas Ithell was aged 77 at the time of his death on 20 November 2022. He was diagnosed with prostate cancer in September 2017 and biopsies revealed bilateral adenocarcinoma of the prostate. He underwent radiotherapy in 2018 and hormone deprivation treatment. From April 2021 onwards his PSA levels increased periodically. In October 2021 his level was 5.5ng/ml having been 1.5ng/m lin April 2021 and 2.7ng/m in July 2021 indicating a recurrence of the cancer and likely incurable. Thomas Ithell was reluctant to undergo further hormone treatment as he found tolerating the side effects difficult. He did not then have his PSA levels tested after November 2021 and was not reviewed at all due to becoming missed to follow up. After he had been seen by the nurse practitioner on 5 November 2021, the letter written by the nurse practitioner for advice from the consultant did not reach the consultant. He was reviewed by a consultant on 22 October 2022 after an urgent suspected cancer GP referral following routine set of blood tests in September 2022, some 10 months later. Mr Ithell died in hospital on 20 November 2022 having been admitted with shortness of breath, the malignancy having caused his death.
-
Content Article
.png.1cc64d6fbb6633694726209f49fe85d7.png)
Sharing his own personal experiences of harm, Richard highlights four routes where patients and families can report patient safety incidents to ensure patients' voices can be heard and, most importantly, acted upon.- Posted
- 10 comments
-
1
-
- (and 10 more)
.png.1cc64d6fbb6633694726209f49fe85d7.png)